|
But,
what is the artistry of a film and how does the treatment of film
material differ from the practices of artists in other arts?
Film is the means of recording
the movement of reality: factual, specific, within time and unique;
of reproducing the moment, again and again, instant by instant,
in its fluid transformation. When it is masterly made, the filmmaker's
conception becomes a living witness of the world that can excite
and hold the audience, plunging it into a rushing current of newly
created reality. It is then that "film-as-art" is born.
In the creative process of film-making
one could find many different ways of treating the material. The
majority of films that you can see in theaters on TV are constructed
in traditional, narrative or theatrical writing styles which link
images through the linear and rigidly logical development of the
plot. That sort of conventional way involves arbitrarily forcing
sequences into obedience to some abstract notion of order. For "The
Freemasons" we chose a much different approach.
The film material of "The
Freemasons" was put together in a way which works according
to the logic of a person's thought - the stream of consciousness.
This was the rationale that dictated the sequence of events and
the editing which formed them into a whole. The birth, development
of thought and connections between associative ideas in the human
mind are subject to laws of their own and sometimes demand forms
of expression which are quite different from the patterns of logical
speculation.
In our film there are many examples
of poetic linking and associative connections both between sequences
and inside the scenes themselves. Such examples are: the story about
Goethe's death as it connects through his bedroom window to the
Buchenwald concentration camp; John Wayne, the movie star ties unexpectedly
to Apollo 11 voyage to the Moon; or the glitter of a trombone in
the orchestra pit transforms into the poster of the "Magic
Flute" opera. These, and many others in the film, follow the
inner logic of the thought processes and associative thinking.
Through this kind of poetic connections,
feeling is heightened and the spectator is made more active. He
or she (the viewer) becomes a participant in the process of discovering
meaning in the presented subject, unsupported by ready-made deductions
from the material or more than embarrassingly obvious pointers by
the director. Complexities of thought, the fundamentally poetic
as well as the dramatic fiber of a subject, such as Freemasonry,
do not have to be placed into framework of the bluntly cliched and
obvious.
The method whereby the filmmaker
obliges the audience to build the separate parts into a whole, and
to think about them beyond what has been overtly stated, is the
only one that puts the audience on a par with the filmmaker in their
perception of the film and the subject that was presented. When
less than everything has been said about the subject, you still
have "room" to think further. We discovered in our research,
that this is precisely the case with the Masonic method of teaching
as well.
Through ritual, symbolism and allegories,
the Freemasons are required to deduce their own conclusions and
discover the truth in the deep complexity of their society. As in
any art, over simplification of an idea means but one thing: Blasphemy!
The best films always possess an inner power that is concentrated
within the image and comes across to the audience in the form of
feelings. It should induce tension in direct response to the narrative
logic which the filmmaker has rooted deeply in the material of his
subject, in this case, Freemasonry.
Because of the shortness of time
and limited space I am not going to analyze the film from the point
of it's historical content (why we chose different story segments
or it's particular narrative line) I will instead concentrate on
a very specific connotative level of the film.
Because
film is a product of culture, it has resonance that goes beyond its
most obvious meanings. The image of a gavel in "The Freemasons"
for example, is more than what it appears to be. For example, the
Masonic connotation of the gavel is as a working tool associated with
the three principal officers of the lodge.
In addition to the culturally determined
connotations, (for example, a top hat represents the idea of elegance
or dress-convention in some solemn ceremonies), film has its own
specific connotative ability. The same top hat used in the context
of a Masonic film means something completely different. In addition
to that, the filmmaker makes some specific choices regarding the
images: the gavel and the Worshipful Master are filmed from a certain
angle; the camera moves or remains static; the colors are bright
or dark; the lighting is from the back or front; the actor is young
or old; the shot is held for a long time or briefly, and so on.
These are specific aids to cinematic
connotation. To use the old cliché, a picture is worth a thousand
words. Our reading of the connotation of a specific shot depends
of its having been chosen from a range of other possible shots.
The connotative sense we comprehend comes from the shot being compared,
not necessarily consciously, with its unrealized companions in the
paradigm, or general model, of this type of shot. A shot of Master
of the lodge in tails and top hat with a gavel in his hand, for
example, conveys a sense that the Master is dignified, serious,
elegant and even mysterious. He appears ready for some kind of ceremony,
because we consciously or unconsciously compare it with, say, a
guy in dirty jeans and greasy hair, which would diminish the importance
of the character or the event.
Conversely, when the significance
of the Master depends not on the shot compared with other potential
shots, but rather on the shot compared with actual shots
that precede or follow it, then we can speak of its SYNTAGMATIC
connotation; that is, the meaning which adheres to it because it
is compared with other shots that we do see. Example: The
moving shot of a huge, magnificent pipe organ, dissolves to a shot
of the Master taking his hat off, which dissolves to a moving shot
of the chaplain and people in tuxedos praying, and so on. This connotes
the beautiful, precise and solemn ritual of an elegant Masonic lodge
whose members respect spirituality and the tradition of the lodge
to which they belong.
These two axis of meaning - the
paradigmatic and the syntagmatic - have real value as tools for
understanding what a film means. As an art, film depends almost
entirely upon these two sets of choices. After a filmmaker has decided
what to shoot, the two pressing questions are: how to shoot it (what
choices to make: the paradigmatic) and how to edit it (the context
of that shot's presentation: the syntagmatic).
Now, the shot of the W. Master
will have different meaning for different people.
1. For the non-Masonic viewer,
the man in tails with top-hat and apron might connote many associative
connections (such as: Leader of a strange cult, president of the
eccentric millionaire's club, some British royal family reunion
member or character from some forties' movie) and none of which
will connect with the "Rising Sun in the East".
2. For the Masonic viewer, on the
other hand, with his paradigmatic experiences in the Masonic order,
besides his already judgmental associative connections about the
excellence of the ritual or dress -code, "Rising Sun"
might very well be the metaphor to connect.
Let's return now to our analysis
of The Freemasons' symbolism.
First and foremost, the guiding
principal for constructing all major elements in the film was number
THREE, the sacred number in Masonry. As Allen Roberts wrote in his
book "Craft and Its Symbols": " You began your symbolic
journey to the Middle Chamber by climbing three steps. These were
representative of the three Stationed Officers of the lodge, the
Worshipful Master, Senior and Junior Wardens. This assured you that
you were not traveling alone. You were being assisted by the Craft
everywhere. Then, too, you had God with you. Three is symbolic of
Deity. You have become a vital part of the Mystic Tie that is Freemasonry."*
Yes, three steps, three degrees, the three Great and three Lesser
lights, and so on, they are all the integral parts which form the
ritual, symbolic and philosophical structure of Masonry. So, "THE
RULE OF THREE" became the guidance in structuring elements
on all three levels of film's connotation: 1. THE NARRATIVE; 2.
THE SYMBOLIC; and 3. RHYTHMIC. |